Amit Mehra of Borderless Capital asserted that quantum technology is still situated many years from posing a risk to Bitcoin. Nevertheless, swift technological progress could necessitate an immediate emphasis on security measures resistant to post-quantum threats.
Even though quantum processing is still situated in its initial stages of development, it could present a considerable danger to Bitcoin and various other proof-of-work protocols in the foreseeable future, a prospect that was highlighted by Amit Mehra, a partner at the venture capital company Borderless Capital.
When questioned about which market trajectories were being tracked by Borderless Capital, Mehra, who was addressing at the Global Blockchain Congress Dubai 2025, revealed that the firm was intently studying “quantum computing” and investigating the methods by which various corporations are crafting resistance-based quantum technology.
Mehra estimated that quantum processing will require until the conclusion of the current decade to achieve full maturity. Nevertheless, he noted that the swift advancement of technology is often underestimated by the general populace:
“Given the recent advancements which have happened in chip technology, in compute tech, and in the power of doing compute in a decentralized way, it [quantum computing] is definitely a problem. If not imminent […] in the very near future.”
The principles of quantum mechanics are utilized by quantum processing to handle data at speeds vastly surpassing contemporary computers. While this specialized technology is still emerging, it could ultimately compromise the cryptographic protection guarding digital currencies and various forms of confidential information, thereby compelling developers to forge novel, quantum-resistant defense protocols.
Bitcoin Must Act Fast to Counter the Quantum Computing Threat
Charles Edwards, who founded the quantitative Bitcoin and digital asset fund Capriole, declared that the current state of affairs is considerably more pressing and contends that preventative measures must be implemented by the industry immediately, prior to the point where action becomes ineffectual.
On Oct. 15, he posted on X, “If Bitcoin doesn’t solve Quantum in the next year, Gold will keep outperforming it forever.”
“It is an emergency and we need to choose a solution next year,”
he wrote.
Preparing for the Quantum Challenge
The apprehension regarding quantum processing is not restricted solely to Mehra and Edwards.
In July, a novel cryptographic architecture was introduced by SUI Research. This framework is intended to protect blockchain networks from potential quantum computing risks, eliminating the necessity for disruptive protocol updates, new user addresses, or the resetting of private keys.
However, while the recently developed remedy is effective for networks like SUI, Near, Solana, and Cosmos, the fundamental issue is not resolved by it for Bitcoin or Ethereum.
In the interim, investment in quantum processing technology is reportedly being weighed by the American federal administration to safeguard matters pertaining to national defense.
A recent report in Bloomberg from October indicated that resources may be designated to this developing technology by the U.S. Department of Commerce, with the intention of remaining competitive with the nation of China.
